Comprehensive Food Security and Vulnerability Analysis (CFSVA)
Rwanda, 2006
Get MicrodataCreated on
Aug 03, 2012
Last modified
Aug 03, 2012
Page views
1707907
Downloads
18570
Name of Old District (ancdist)
Data file: June_10_Section1_11
Overview
Valid:
2783
Valid (weighted):
2783
Invalid:
0
Invalid (weighted):
0
Questions and instructions
Literal question
Name of Old District
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | Weighted | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BICUMBI | 37 | 29 |
1.1%
|
|
| BUDAHA | 24 | 36 |
1.3%
|
|
| BUGARAGARA | 48 | 28 |
1%
|
|
| BUGARAMA | 41 | 42 |
1.5%
|
|
| BUGARURA | 9 | 13 |
0.5%
|
|
| BUHOMA | 24 | 24 |
0.9%
|
|
| BUKAMBA | 30 | 30 |
1.1%
|
|
| BUKONYA | 12 | 18 |
0.6%
|
|
| BUKUNZI | 36 | 37 |
1.3%
|
|
| BULIZA | 20 | 23 |
0.8%
|
|
| BUNGWE | 12 | 18 |
0.6%
|
|
| BUTARO | 18 | 18 |
0.6%
|
|
| CYANZARWE | 24 | 24 |
0.9%
|
|
| CYARUBARE | 50 | 40 |
1.4%
|
|
| CYERU | 8 | 12 |
0.4%
|
|
| GABIRO | 40 | 27 |
1%
|
|
| GASABO | 19 | 22 |
0.8%
|
|
| GASEKE | 12 | 18 |
0.6%
|
|
| GASHONGA | 30 | 31 |
1.1%
|
|
| GASHORA | 64 | 67 |
2.4%
|
|
| GASIZA | 21 | 31 |
1.1%
|
|
| GATARE | 35 | 36 |
1.3%
|
|
| GIKONKO | 12 | 10 |
0.3%
|
|
| GISUNZU | 61 | 79 |
2.8%
|
|
| HUMURE | 29 | 20 |
0.7%
|
|
| IMPALA | 60 | 62 |
2.2%
|
|
| ITABIRE | 18 | 27 |
1%
|
|
| KABAGARI | 15 | 12 |
0.4%
|
|
| KABARE | 14 | 8 |
0.3%
|
|
| KABARONDO | 25 | 20 |
0.7%
|
|
| KADUHA | 12 | 10 |
0.3%
|
|
| KAGEYO | 12 | 18 |
0.6%
|
|
| KAHI | 34 | 24 |
0.9%
|
|
| KAMONYI | 17 | 14 |
0.5%
|
|
| KANAMA | 6 | 9 |
0.3%
|
|
| KANOMBE | 4 | 5 |
0.2%
|
|
| KARABA | 27 | 22 |
0.8%
|
|
| KAYOVE | 61 | 79 |
2.8%
|
|
| KAYUMBU | 12 | 10 |
0.3%
|
|
| KIBINGO | 41 | 44 |
1.6%
|
|
| KIGARAMA | 24 | 19 |
0.7%
|
|
| KINIGI | 18 | 18 |
0.6%
|
|
| KINIHIRA | 9 | 13 |
0.5%
|
|
| KIRUHURA | 9 | 7 |
0.3%
|
|
| KISARO | 13 | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| MARABA | 24 | 26 |
0.9%
|
|
| MIRENGE | 41 | 33 |
1.2%
|
|
| MUDASOMWA | 15 | 22 |
0.8%
|
|
| MUGOMBWA | 49 | 52 |
1.9%
|
|
| MUHANGA | 9 | 13 |
0.5%
|
|
| MUHAZI | 12 | 10 |
0.3%
|
|
| MURAMBI | 48 | 34 |
1.2%
|
|
| MUSHUBI | 25 | 37 |
1.3%
|
|
| MUTOBO | 30 | 30 |
1.1%
|
|
| MUTURA | 32 | 32 |
1.2%
|
|
| MUVUMBA | 58 | 42 |
1.5%
|
|
| NDIZA | 12 | 18 |
0.6%
|
|
| NGARAMA | 24 | 17 |
0.6%
|
|
| NGENDA | 70 | 72 |
2.6%
|
|
| NSHILI | 18 | 27 |
1%
|
|
| NTENYO | 17 | 14 |
0.5%
|
|
| NTONGWE | 15 | 12 |
0.4%
|
|
| NYAGISAGARA | 3 | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| NYAKIZU | 48 | 51 |
1.8%
|
|
| NYAMASHEKE | 36 | 37 |
1.3%
|
|
| NYAMATA | 63 | 66 |
2.4%
|
|
| NYAMUGALI | 9 | 13 |
0.5%
|
|
| NYAMURE | 21 | 17 |
0.6%
|
|
| NYAMYUMBA | 30 | 39 |
1.4%
|
|
| NYARUBUYE | 54 | 44 |
1.6%
|
|
| NYARUGURU | 48 | 51 |
1.8%
|
|
| NYARUTOVU | 15 | 22 |
0.8%
|
|
| REBERO | 17 | 19 |
0.7%
|
|
| RUKARA | 96 | 55 |
2%
|
|
| RUKIRA | 33 | 26 |
1%
|
|
| RULINDO | 12 | 14 |
0.5%
|
|
| RUSENYI | 90 | 116 |
4.2%
|
|
| RUSHAKI | 16 | 18 |
0.7%
|
|
| RUSHASHI | 16 | 18 |
0.7%
|
|
| RUSUMO | 65 | 52 |
1.9%
|
|
| RUTSIRO | 32 | 41 |
1.5%
|
|
| RUYUMBA | 12 | 10 |
0.3%
|
|
| RWAMIKO | 24 | 28 |
1%
|
|
| SAVE | 12 | 10 |
0.3%
|
|
| SHYORONGI | 12 | 14 |
0.5%
|
|
| VILLE D'UMUTARA | 24 | 14 |
0.5%
|
|
| VILLE DE BUTARE | 24 | 19 |
0.7%
|
|
| VILLE DE BYUMBA | 12 | 14 |
0.5%
|
|
| VILLE DE CYANGUGU | 31 | 32 |
1.1%
|
|
| VILLE DE GIKONGORO | 6 | 9 |
0.3%
|
|
| VILLE DE GISENYI | 42 | 42 |
1.5%
|
|
| VILLE DE GITARAMA | 24 | 19 |
0.7%
|
|
| VILLE DE KABUGA | 24 | 28 |
1%
|
|
| VILLE DE KIBUNGO | 30 | 24 |
0.9%
|
|
| VILLE DE KIBUYE | 50 | 64 |
2.3%
|
|
| VILLE DE NYANZA | 18 | 15 |
0.5%
|
|
| VILLE DE RUHANGO | 15 | 12 |
0.4%
|
|
| VILLE DE RUHENGERI | 48 | 48 |
1.7%
|
|
| VILLE DE RWAMAGANA | 25 | 20 |
0.7%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.